How can I professionally address repeated lack of detail in user stories without causing tension in the team?
I'm a developer on a Scrum team, and we've been running into recurring issues where user stories are lacking sufficient detail before we begin implementation. I've brought this up multiple times, but I feel the concerns aren't being seriously considered. In a recent conversation, I expressed frustration and told my Scrum Master that his resistance to my feedback felt hostile and that neither he nor the team seemed willing to understand my perspective. Looking back, I realize this may have come off as too direct or confrontational. How can I recover from this situation professionally and reframe the conversation in a constructive way? I want to improve communication without damaging relationships or team morale. Also, how can I better advocate for clearer stories without escalating tension?

I'm a developer on a Scrum team, and we've been running into recurring issues where user stories are lacking sufficient detail before we begin implementation. I've brought this up multiple times, but I feel the concerns aren't being seriously considered.
In a recent conversation, I expressed frustration and told my Scrum Master that his resistance to my feedback felt hostile and that neither he nor the team seemed willing to understand my perspective. Looking back, I realize this may have come off as too direct or confrontational.
How can I recover from this situation professionally and reframe the conversation in a constructive way? I want to improve communication without damaging relationships or team morale. Also, how can I better advocate for clearer stories without escalating tension?