AI helps me write code — but it kept turning into a mess. So I built a tool to fix it.
If you’ve used AI to code, you know this feeling: it’s fast, but it also spirals out of control real quick. Spaghetti logic, inconsistent architecture, and unclear design decisions — all because we skipped the planning step. That’s why I created Stack Studio, an AI-powered software architect that helps you design features before touching the keyboard. Why I built it: I was tired of backtracking and rewriting AI-generated code. Every time I asked for help with a new feature, the AI lacked context, and the end result was always a patchwork of guesses. What was missing? Clear feature planning grounded in the actual codebase. How it works You connect your repo (mono or not), and Stack Studio gives you: Auto-generated architecture diagrams and design specs AI-guided feature planning, with real-time code context Export-ready prompts for whatever assistant you like It’s like having a systems architect whispering in your ear, telling you what you’re building and why — so AI can finally code with purpose. Why it matters: Letting AI drive the IDE without a plan is like building a house with no blueprint. Stack Studio brings back the lost art of design — powered by AI — and makes your whole workflow smarter, from idea to PR. I’ve been using it daily, and the quality of my code (and my team’s sanity) has seriously leveled up. https://stackstudio.io/ Would love your thoughts — do you plan features before you code, or just dive in and figure it out later?
If you’ve used AI to code, you know this feeling: it’s fast, but it also spirals out of control real quick. Spaghetti logic, inconsistent architecture, and unclear design decisions — all because we skipped the planning step.
That’s why I created Stack Studio, an AI-powered software architect that helps you design features before touching the keyboard.
Why I built it:
I was tired of backtracking and rewriting AI-generated code. Every time I asked for help with a new feature, the AI lacked context, and the end result was always a patchwork of guesses. What was missing? Clear feature planning grounded in the actual codebase.
How it works
You connect your repo (mono or not), and Stack Studio gives you:
- Auto-generated architecture diagrams and design specs
- AI-guided feature planning, with real-time code context
- Export-ready prompts for whatever assistant you like It’s like having a systems architect whispering in your ear, telling you what you’re building and why — so AI can finally code with purpose.
Why it matters:
Letting AI drive the IDE without a plan is like building a house with no blueprint. Stack Studio brings back the lost art of design — powered by AI — and makes your whole workflow smarter, from idea to PR.
I’ve been using it daily, and the quality of my code (and my team’s sanity) has seriously leveled up.
Would love your thoughts — do you plan features before you code, or just dive in and figure it out later?
