.webp?#)
.jpg?width=1920&height=1920&fit=bounds&quality=80&format=jpg&auto=webp#)
use case relationships and actors specification [closed]
i'm making a use case diagram for a specific system, the question is if the requirment says that the user shall be able to specify it's goal whether it's a gaining weight or lose or maintain. so i put it as i generalization for this use case, do you think ut's correct? or should i put it just the only use case which is the specify health goal? and is it good to write "specify " in use case? i feel it's incorrect somehow. another question, if my system itse;f will provides the notifications there's no need to put the notification as an actor ? and the same for if my AI is internal, is it good to put it as a secondary actor?
![use case relationships and actors specification [closed]](https://cdn.sstatic.net/Sites/softwareengineering/Img/apple-touch-icon@2.png?v=1ef7363febba)
i'm making a use case diagram for a specific system, the question is if the requirment says that the user shall be able to specify it's goal whether it's a gaining weight or lose or maintain. so i put it as i generalization for this use case, do you think ut's correct? or should i put it just the only use case which is the specify health goal? and is it good to write "specify " in use case? i feel it's incorrect somehow. another question, if my system itse;f will provides the notifications there's no need to put the notification as an actor ? and the same for if my AI is internal, is it good to put it as a secondary actor?
